London Review of Education

679 papers and 7.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 679 papers published in London Review of Education in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in London Review of Education usually cover Education (429 papers), Sociology and Political Science (196 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (185 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Policies and Reforms (112 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (91 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in London Review of Education are Paul Temple, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Michael Fielding, Andrea Creech, Lesley Gourlay, Kelly Coate, Ken Spours, Max Coltheart, Gill Kirkup and Ann Oakley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in London Review of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in London Review of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in London Review of Education.

Countries where authors publish in London Review of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in London Review of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in London Review of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites London Review of Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025