The Journal of Men s Studies

614 papers and 8.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 614 papers published in The Journal of Men s Studies in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Men s Studies usually cover Gender Studies (373 papers), Sociology and Political Science (281 papers) and Clinical Psychology (76 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Roles and Identity Studies (270 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (107 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Men s Studies are Will Courtenay, Richard Tewksbury, Ronald F. Levant, Katherine Richmond, Cliff Cheng, Ramon Hinojosa, Shaun R. Harper, Rob Palkovitz, Alan J. Hawkins and Raewyn Connell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Men s Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Men s Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Men s Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Men s Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Men s Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Men s Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Men s Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025