Archives of toxicology. Supplement

835 papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 835 papers published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement usually cover Molecular Biology (174 papers), Cancer Research (159 papers) and Pharmacology (134 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (148 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (93 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of toxicology. Supplement are Anders Goksøyr, Clifford R. Elcombe, Mira Katan, P.C.H. Hollman, Lewis L. Smith, Brian G. Lake, Abraham Brouwer, Rolf Schulte‐Hermann, Tim J.B. Gray and K.R. Butterworth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement.

Countries where authors publish in Archives of toxicology. Supplement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of toxicology. Supplement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of toxicology. Supplement more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025