King s Law Journal

396 papers and 1.0k indexed citations

About

The 396 papers published in King s Law Journal in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in King s Law Journal usually cover Law (165 papers), Political Science and International Relations (136 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (67 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (68 papers), European and International Law Studies (40 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in King s Law Journal are Timothy Caulfield, Neil Gunningham, Alastair V. Campbell, Roger Brownsword, Michael Gordon, Jane Kaye, Susan Gibbons, Deryck Beyleveld, Anna Sergi and Keith Ewing.

In The Last Decade

King s Law Journal

236 papers receiving 707 citations

Countries where authors publish in King s Law Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in King s Law Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in King s Law Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King s Law Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in King s Law Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in King s Law Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in King s Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026