Criminal Law and Philosophy

516 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 516 papers published in Criminal Law and Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Criminal Law and Philosophy usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (278 papers), Sociology and Political Science (197 papers) and Philosophy (160 papers) specifically the topics of Free Will and Agency (271 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (117 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Criminal Law and Philosophy are Douglas Husak, Nicole A. Vincent, John Danaher, Lucia Zedner, Christoph Bublitz, Reinhard Merkel, Michael S. Moore, R. A. Duff, Victor Tadros and John Gardner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Criminal Law and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Criminal Law and Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Criminal Law and Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Criminal Law and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Criminal Law and Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Criminal Law and Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criminal Law and Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025