Ethical Perspectives

330 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 330 papers published in Ethical Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethical Perspectives usually cover Sociology and Political Science (70 papers), Political Science and International Relations (67 papers) and Philosophy (52 papers) specifically the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (29 papers), Ethics in medical practice (25 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethical Perspectives are Axel Gosseries, Chantal Mouffe, Harry G. Frankfurt, Armin Grünwald, Mary Douglas, Richard Rorty, Chris Gastmans, Johan Galtung, Bert Broeckaert and Zygmunt Bauman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ethical Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethical Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethical Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Ethical Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethical Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethical Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethical Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025