Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
JUICE, software for vegetation classification
2002792 citationsLubomír TichýJournal of Vegetation Scienceprofile →
Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures
2002642 citationsMilan Chytrý, Lubomír Tichý et al.Journal of Vegetation Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lubomír Tichý's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lubomír Tichý with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lubomír Tichý more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lubomír Tichý. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lubomír Tichý. The network helps show where Lubomír Tichý may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lubomír Tichý
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lubomír Tichý.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lubomír Tichý based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lubomír Tichý. Lubomír Tichý is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Čeplová, Natálie, Zdeňka Lososová, David Zelený, et al.. (2015). Phylogenetic diversity of central-European urban plant communities: effects of alien species and habitat types. Preslia. 87(1). 1–16.25 indexed citations
10.
Pyšek, Petr, Jiří Danihelka, Jiřı́ Sádlo, et al.. (2012). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia. 84(2). 155–255.260 indexed citations
Chytrý, Milan, Jan Wild, Petr Pyšek, et al.. (2009). Maps of the level of invasion of the Czech Republic by alien plants. Preslia. 81(3). 187–207.34 indexed citations
Chytrý, Milan, Petr Pyšek, Lubomír Tichý, Ilona Knollová, & Jiří Danihelka. (2005). Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitativeassessment across habitats. Preslia. 77(4).221 indexed citations
Bureš, Petr, Yifeng Wang, Lubomír Tichý, & Jan Bartoš. (2003). Polypodium x mantoniae and new localities of P. interjectum inthe Czech Republic confirmed using flow cytometry. Preslia. 75(4).12 indexed citations
17.
Danihelka, Jiří, et al.. (2000). Stipa eriocaulis - an overlooked species of the Czech flora.. Preslia. 72. 399–410.1 indexed citations
18.
Chytrý, Milan, et al.. (1999). Phytogeographical boundary between the Pannonicum andHercynicum: a multivariate analysis of landscape in thePodyjí/Thayatal National Park, Czech Republic/Austria. Preslia. 71(1).6 indexed citations
19.
Tichý, Lubomír. (1999). Teplotní poměry a vegetace na lokalitě Sloní hřbet v Národnímparku Podyjí. Preslia.1 indexed citations
20.
Tichý, Lubomír, et al.. (1997). Wenig bekannte Trockenrasengesellschaften am Südostrand derBöhmischen Masse. Tuexenia. 17(1).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.