Philip M. Dixon
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Michael R. EasterlingStephen P. EllnerMatt LiebmanJ. N. PerryKenneth J. MooreTimothy H. KeittOttar N. BjørnstadMichael C. Newman
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (40 papers)Plant and animal studies (18 papers)Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Dixon
183 papers receiving 11.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Ecology 3.2k
- Plant Science 2.8k
- Molecular Biology 2.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.2k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Dixon. The network helps show where Philip M. Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Dixon. Philip M. Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecologybreakdown → | 4512 |
| 20 | 25 |
About Philip M. Dixon
Philip M. Dixon is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Horticulture, having authored 189 papers that have together received 11.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (40 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (550 citations) and Ecology (3.2k citations). Philip M. Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Easterling, Stephen P. Ellner, Matt Liebman, J. N. Perry, Kenneth J. Moore, Timothy H. Keitt, Ottar N. Bjørnstad, Michael C. Newman, Rebecca R. Sharitz and Jacob Weiner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Nature Biotechnology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.