Countries where authors publish in Functional Ecology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Functional Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Functional Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional Ecology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Functional Ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Functional Ecology.
About Functional Ecology
The 5.6k papers published in Functional Ecology in the last decades have received a total of 337.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Functional Ecology usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (582 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.0k papers), Ecology (950 papers), Insect Science (256 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (413 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Behavior and Reproduction (626 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (477 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (469 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (279 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (262 papers), Plant and animal studies (259 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (198 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Functional Ecology are John A. Wiens, Stephen C. Stearns, Jon Lloyd, John Taylor, Éric Garnier, Sandra Lavorel, Peter B. Reich, Bill Shipley, Mark Westoby and Andrew Clarke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.