Journal of Chinese Philosophy

1.4k papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy usually cover Sociology and Political Science (708 papers), Philosophy (120 papers) and Cultural Studies (87 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (662 papers), Japanese History and Culture (81 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Chinese Philosophy are Chung‐Ying Cheng, David B. Wong, Kwong‐loi Shun, Lisa Raphals, Karyn Lai, Robert Elliott Allinson, Elisabeth Hsü, Roger T. Ames, Jürgen Habermas and Paul R. Goldin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Chinese Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Chinese Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Chinese Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025