Countries where authors publish in Near Eastern Archaeology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Near Eastern Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Near Eastern Archaeology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology.
About Near Eastern Archaeology
The 628 papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Near Eastern Archaeology usually cover Space and Planetary Science (131 papers), Archeology (510 papers), Paleontology (175 papers), Religious studies (62 papers) and Archeology (13 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and Historical Studies (339 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (224 papers), Ancient Near East History (192 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (175 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (131 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (119 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (62 papers) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Near Eastern Archaeology are Edward B. Banning, Jesse Casana, Ömür Harmanşah, Israel Finkelstein, Amihai Mazar, Jason Ur, Avraham Faust, Pierre de Miroschedji, Thomas E. Levy and Sarah Parcak.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.