Journal of Narrative Theory

293 papers and 532 indexed citations i.

About

The 293 papers published in Journal of Narrative Theory in the last decades have received a total of 532 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Narrative Theory usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (200 papers), Sociology and Political Science (69 papers) and Philosophy (51 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (52 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (51 papers) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Narrative Theory are Dan Shen, Marco Caracciolo, Alice Bell, Jan Alber, Deborah Bird Rose, Joshua Clover, Barbara Foley, Tison Pugh, Paul Dawson and David Ellis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Narrative Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Narrative Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Narrative Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Narrative Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Narrative Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Narrative Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Narrative Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025