twentieth-century music

216 papers and 739 indexed citations i.

About

The 216 papers published in twentieth-century music in the last decades have received a total of 739 indexed citations. Papers published in twentieth-century music usually cover Music (169 papers), Sociology and Political Science (37 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (35 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (114 papers), Music History and Culture (105 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in twentieth-century music are Georgina Born, Benjamin Piekut, Eric Drott, Kyle Devine, Eric Clarke, Anahid Kassabian, Charles Wilson, David Clarke, Allan F. Moore and Jason Stanyek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in twentieth-century music

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in twentieth-century music. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in twentieth-century music.

Countries where authors publish in twentieth-century music

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in twentieth-century music. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in twentieth-century music with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites twentieth-century music more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025