Early Popular Visual Culture

363 papers and 578 indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture in the last decades have received a total of 578 indexed citations. Papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture usually cover Economics and Econometrics (144 papers), History (97 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (89 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (141 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (49 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early Popular Visual Culture are Stephen Bottomore, André Gaudreault, Erkki Huhtamo, Simone Natale, Simon Schaffer, Tom Gunning, John Plunkett, Peter Lamont, Malcolm Cook and David A. H. Wilson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture.

Countries where authors publish in Early Popular Visual Culture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early Popular Visual Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Popular Visual Culture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025