Early Popular Visual Culture

372 papers and 713 indexed citations

About

The 372 papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture in the last decades have received a total of 713 indexed citations. Papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture usually cover Economics and Econometrics (149 papers), History (98 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (92 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (146 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (50 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early Popular Visual Culture are Stephen Bottomore, André Gaudreault, Simone Natale, Erkki Huhtamo, John Plunkett, Tom Gunning, Peter Lamont, David A. H. Wilson, Simon Schaffer and Malcolm Cook.

In The Last Decade

Early Popular Visual Culture

211 papers receiving 485 citations

Countries where authors publish in Early Popular Visual Culture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early Popular Visual Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Popular Visual Culture more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early Popular Visual Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026