The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
About
In The Last Decade
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
4.7k papers receiving 177.3k citations
Fields of papers published in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry.
Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry more than expected).
- Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships (2002)
- Methionine metabolism in mammals (1990)
- In vitro antiproliferative, apoptotic and antioxidant activities of punicalagin, ellagic acid and a total pomegranate tannin extract are enhanced in combination with other polyphenols as found in pomegranate juice (2005)
- Anti-inflammatory properties of a pomegranate extract and its metabolite urolithin-A in a colitis rat model and the effect of colon inflammation on phenolic metabolism (2009)
- The dietary hydrolysable tannin punicalagin releases ellagic acid that induces apoptosis in human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells by using the mitochondrial pathway (2005)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.