Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds

210 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 210 papers published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds usually cover Sociology and Political Science (169 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (43 papers) and Gender Studies (35 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Games and Media (159 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (41 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Games (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds are Enrico Gandolfi, Jonas Linderoth, Steven Conway, Lina Eklund, Nicholas David Bowman, Guillaume Chanel, Niklas Ravaja, Simo Järvelä, Inger Ekman and Benjamin Ultan Cowley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025