Nonprofit Policy Forum

300 papers and 1.5k indexed citations

About

The 300 papers published in Nonprofit Policy Forum in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nonprofit Policy Forum usually cover Sociology and Political Science (220 papers), Public Administration (68 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (51 papers) specifically the topics of Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (170 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (76 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nonprofit Policy Forum are Steven Rathgeb Smith, Michal Almog‐Bar, Kate Cooney, Susan D. Phillips, Stefan Toepler, Dennis R. Young, Ruth Simsa, Heather MacIndoe, Margaret Harris and Helmut K. Anheier.

In The Last Decade

Nonprofit Policy Forum

235 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Nonprofit Policy Forum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nonprofit Policy Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nonprofit Policy Forum.

Countries where authors publish in Nonprofit Policy Forum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nonprofit Policy Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nonprofit Policy Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nonprofit Policy Forum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026