Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Life Course Transitions and Housework: Marriage, Parenthood, and Time on Housework
2008373 citationsJaneen Baxter, Belinda Hewitt et al.Journal of Marriage and the Familyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Janeen Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janeen Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janeen Baxter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janeen Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janeen Baxter. The network helps show where Janeen Baxter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janeen Baxter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janeen Baxter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janeen Baxter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janeen Baxter. Janeen Baxter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Plage, Stefanie, Francisco Perales, & Janeen Baxter. (2016). Doing Gender Overnight? Parenthood, Gender and Sleep Quantity and Quality in Australia. Family matters. 73–81.4 indexed citations
9.
Baxter, Janeen & Francisco Perales. (2013). And yet they move: shifts in gender attitudes across the transition into parenthood. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies. 31–31.2 indexed citations
10.
Baxter, Janeen, et al.. (2013). The use of cannabis for medical purposes. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA). 7(1). 1–17.3 indexed citations
11.
Baxter, Janeen & Jenny Chesters. (2011). Perceptions of work-family balance: How effective are family-friendly policies?. Australian journal of labour economics. 14(2). 139–151.21 indexed citations
12.
Chesters, Jenny, Janeen Baxter, & Mark Western. (2009). Paid and Unpaid Work in Australian Households: Trends in the Gender Division of Labour, 1986-2005. Australian journal of labour economics. 12(1). 89–108.15 indexed citations
13.
Buchler, Sandra, Janeen Baxter, Michele Haynes, & Mark Western. (2008). The Social and Demographic Characteristics of Cohabiters in Australia: Towards a Typology of Cohabiting Couples. Family matters. 82(82). 1–28.7 indexed citations
Western, Mark, Belinda Hewitt, & Janeen Baxter. (2005). Marriage and Money: Variations across the Earnings Distribution. Australian journal of labour economics. 8(2). 163–179.7 indexed citations
Baxter, Janeen. (2001). Marital status and the division of household labour: cohabitation vs marriage.. Family matters. 58(58). 16–21.10 indexed citations
19.
Baxter, Janeen. (1997). Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 28(3). 220.108 indexed citations
20.
Baxter, Janeen. (1994). Why don't men do more housework? [Work in progress at the Australian National University. Research School of Social Sciences]. Eureka street. 4(9). 37.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.