George Yancey
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- Michael O. EmersonRachel Tolbert KimbroRichard H. LewisDavid A. WilliamsonAmanda DavisJames L. Ritchie‐DunhamMatt BradshawKoichiro Shiba
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (14 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandIreland
In The Last Decade
George Yancey
45 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- Health 227
- Social Psychology 218
- Gender Studies 188
- Demography 178
Countries citing papers authored by George Yancey
This map shows the geographic impact of George Yancey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Yancey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Yancey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Yancey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Yancey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Yancey. The network helps show where George Yancey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Yancey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Yancey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Yancey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Yancey. George Yancey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Christian Theology and Attitudes Toward Political and Religious Ideological Groups | 2 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | AFRICAN AMERICANS IN INTERRACIAL CONGREGATIONS AN ANALYSIS OF DEMOGRAPHICS, SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND SOCIAL ATTITUDES | 11 |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | Taking Stock of America's Attitudes on Cultural Diversity: An Analysis of Public Deliberation on Multiculturalism, Assimilation and Intermarriage* | 14 |
| 19 | 183 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About George Yancey
George Yancey is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (14 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (1.3k citations), Health (227 citations) and Gender Studies (188 citations). George Yancey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Michael O. Emerson, Rachel Tolbert Kimbro, Richard H. Lewis, David A. Williamson, Amanda Davis, James L. Ritchie‐Dunham, Matt Bradshaw, Koichiro Shiba, Richard G. Cowden and Byron R. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Scientific Reports and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.