Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

220.6k citations
7.2k papers · · active since 1990

Impact in

  • Spectroscopy top 0.1%
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
    • Analytical chemistry methods development

Papers in

    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 5.3k
    • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 322
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 36

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

6.3k papers receiving 193.2k citations

Peers

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Spectroscopy 123.2k
  • Analytical Chemistry 3.9k
  • Toxicology 1.4k
  • Molecular Biology 18.7k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 795
Replace Electrophoresis with:
Electrophoresis United States
Journal of Mass Spectrometry United States
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry United States
Journal of Proteome Research United States
Journal of Chromatographic Science United States
Journal of Molecular Structure India
Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy China
Chromatographia China
Sensors and Actuators B Chemical China
Analytical Methods China
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry relative to Electrophoresis United States Electrophoresis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Electrophoresis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

About Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

The 7.2k papers published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry in the last decades have received a total of 220.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry usually cover Spectroscopy (5.6k papers), Toxicology (36 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (26 papers), Molecular Biology (266 papers) and Computational Mechanics (85 papers) specifically the topics of Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5.3k papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (322 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (94 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (84 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (84 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (36 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (23 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry are John R. Yates, Jimmy K. Eng, Ashley L. McCormack, Stephen E. Stein, Fong‐Fu Hsu, JOHN W. TURK, Scott A. McLuckey, Michael L. Gross, David John Harvey and Jennifer S. Brodbelt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact