Electrophoresis

13.7k papers and 399.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.7k papers published in Electrophoresis in the last decades have received a total of 399.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Electrophoresis usually cover Biomedical Engineering (7.5k papers), Molecular Biology (5.4k papers) and Spectroscopy (4.1k papers) specifically the topics of Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6.5k papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2.5k papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electrophoresis are Manuel C. Peitsch, Nicolas Guex, Pier Giorgio Righetti, Thierry Rabilloud, John S. Cottrell, Darryl Pappin, David N. Perkins, David M. Creasy, Petr Boček and Angelika Görg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Electrophoresis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Electrophoresis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electrophoresis.

Countries where authors publish in Electrophoresis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electrophoresis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electrophoresis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrophoresis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025