Anthropological Forum

627 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 627 papers published in Anthropological Forum in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Anthropological Forum usually cover Anthropology (243 papers), Sociology and Political Science (219 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (116 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (189 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (63 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropological Forum are John Comaroff, Jean Comaroff, Tim Rowse, Philip Moore, Peter Sutton, Robert Tonkinson, Susanna Trnka, Roger Ivar Lohmann, Catherine Trundle and Theodore Schwartz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anthropological Forum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropological Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropological Forum.

Countries where authors publish in Anthropological Forum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropological Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropological Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropological Forum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025