Computers in libraries

538 papers and 2.0k indexed citations

About

The 538 papers published in Computers in libraries in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Computers in libraries usually cover Information Systems (230 papers), Library and Information Sciences (54 papers) and Conservation (24 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (108 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (79 papers) and Library Science and Information Literacy (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computers in libraries are Marshall Breeding, H. Frank Cervone, Lisa Ennis, Eric Lease Morgan, Barbara Wood, David Evans, Jody Condit Fagan, William D. Milheim, Daniel Ferrer and Tom Peters.

In The Last Decade

Computers in libraries

293 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Computers in libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computers in libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computers in libraries.

Countries where authors publish in Computers in libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computers in libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computers in libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computers in libraries more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026