Journal of Web Librarianship

373 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 373 papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship usually cover Information Systems (245 papers), Library and Information Sciences (90 papers) and Communication (41 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (142 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (83 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Web Librarianship are Barbara Blummer, Bradford Lee Eden, Noa Aharony, Melissa Adler, Jody Condit Fagan, Sarah Williams, Brian Mathews, Gary R. Collins, Lisa C. Thomas and Anabel Quan‐Haase.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Web Librarianship

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Web Librarianship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Web Librarianship more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025