Educational Gerontology

2.5k papers and 29.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Educational Gerontology in the last decades have received a total of 29.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Gerontology usually cover Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (1.0k papers), Demography (928 papers) and General Health Professions (478 papers) specifically the topics of Aging and Gerontology Research (1.0k papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (526 papers) and Technology Use by Older Adults (351 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Gerontology are Gillian M. Boulton‐Lewis, Lorraine T. Dorfman, J. Conrad Glass, Galit Nimrod, Sunghee H. Tak, Joseph Schwartz, Phillip G. Clark, David A. Peterson, Allan B. de Guzman and Sharan B. Merriam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Gerontology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Gerontology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Gerontology.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Gerontology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Gerontology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Gerontology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Gerontology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025