Arabic Sciences and Philosophy

281 papers and 631 indexed citations i.

About

The 281 papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 631 indexed citations. Papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (188 papers), Archeology (120 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (90 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval and Classical Philosophy (186 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (98 papers) and Ancient Astronomy and Mathematical Instruments (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy are Roshdi Rashed, Robert Wisnovsky, George Saliba, A. Mark Smith, Peter Adamson, Karine Chemla, Ayman Shihadeh, Nader El-Bizri, Richard M. Frank and Michael E. Marmura.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arabic Sciences and Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arabic Sciences and Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025