Journal of Scottish Philosophy

208 papers and 466 indexed citations i.

About

The 208 papers published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 466 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (129 papers), Political Science and International Relations (58 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (43 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophical Ethics and Theory (84 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (31 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Scottish Philosophy are Eric Schliesser, Christopher J. Berry, Maria Pia Paganelli, Craig R. Smith, Gideon Yaffe, Alexander Broadie, Ryan Patrick Hanley, Lorne Falkenstein, Don Garrett and R. F. Stalley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Scottish Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Scottish Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Scottish Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025