International Journal of Systematic Theology

695 citations
386 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology

Papers in

    • Christian Theology and Mission 138
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 131
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 43
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 125
    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology 69
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 49

International Journal of Systematic Theology

231 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

International Journal of Systematic Theology
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Religious studies 325
  • Philosophy 336
  • History 108
  • Classics 31
  • Sociology and Political Science 265
Replace Studies in Christian Ethics with:
Studies in Christian Ethics United Kingdom
Revue Théologique de Louvain
Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte Germany
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie Germany
Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology Norway
Dialog United States
Horizons United States
Temenos - Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion Finland
AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies United States
Jewish History United States
International Journal of Systematic Theology relative to Studies in Christian Ethics United Kingdom Studies in Christian Ethics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Studies in Christian Ethics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Systematic Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Systematic Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Systematic Theology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology.

About International Journal of Systematic Theology

The 386 papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology in the last decades have received a total of 695 indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology usually cover Religious studies (211 papers), Philosophy (205 papers), History (89 papers), Classics (20 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (114 papers) specifically the topics of Christian Theology and Mission (138 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (131 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (125 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (75 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (69 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (49 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (43 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Systematic Theology are Oliver D. Crisp, Karen Kilby, G. van den Brink, Robert W. Jenson, Nicholas M. Healy, John Webster, Kevin J. Vanhoozer, Simon Oliver, Thomas White and Nathan MacDonald.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact