This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fat Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fat Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fat Studies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Fat Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fat Studies.
About Fat Studies
The 295 papers published in Fat Studies in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Fat Studies usually cover Pharmacy (240 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 papers), Gender Studies (35 papers), Cultural Studies (26 papers) and Museology (11 papers) specifically the topics of Obesity and Health Practices (240 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (114 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (52 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (24 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (21 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (20 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (17 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fat Studies are Joan C. Chrisler, Deborah Lupton, Cat Pausé, Jeannine A. Gailey, May Friedman, George Parker, Andrea E. Bombak, Angela Barney, Francis Ray White and Erin Cameron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.