Qualitative Psychology

251 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 251 papers published in Qualitative Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Qualitative Psychology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (79 papers), Education (49 papers) and Social Psychology (43 papers) specifically the topics of Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (19 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (15 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Applications (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Psychology are Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, Joseph G. Ponterotto, Sue L. Motulsky, Heidi M. Levitt, Carol Gilligan, Susan L. Morrow, Joseph A. Maxwell, Rivka Tuval‐Mashiach and Oliver Robinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Qualitative Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025