Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomieCanada
Journal of Agricultural and Applied EconomicsUnited States
Agricultural EconomicsUnited States
AgribusinessUnited States
Development and ChangeUnited States
Land EconomicsUnited States
Rural SociologyUnited States
Society & Natural ResourcesUnited States
Forest Policy and EconomicsUnited States
Journal of Agricultural EconomicsUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to European Review of Agricultural Economics
European Review of Agricultural Economics · 1×
×1.218.2kEE
×1.718.0kGABS
×1.06.5kPS
×1.04.2kSM
×1.76.8kSS
Citations per year, relative to European Review of Agricultural Economics
European Review of Agricultural Economics · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in European Review of Agricultural Economics
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Review of Agricultural Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Review of Agricultural Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Review of Agricultural Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in European Review of Agricultural Economics
This network shows the impact of papers published in European Review of Agricultural Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Review of Agricultural Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.