Studies in Documentary Film

276 papers and 847 indexed citations

About

The 276 papers published in Studies in Documentary Film in the last decades have received a total of 847 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Documentary Film usually cover Economics and Econometrics (163 papers), Sociology and Political Science (117 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (55 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (163 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (39 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Documentary Film are Kate Nash, Craig Hight, Christian Christensen, Ohad Landesman, John Corner, Jon Dovey, Tianqi Yu, Stacie Friend, Bill Nichols and Marina Svensson.

In The Last Decade

Studies in Documentary Film

191 papers receiving 720 citations

Fields of papers published in Studies in Documentary Film

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Documentary Film. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Documentary Film.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Documentary Film

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Documentary Film. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Documentary Film with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Documentary Film more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026