This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theatre Survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theatre Survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theatre Survey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Theatre Survey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theatre Survey.
About Theatre Survey
The 546 papers published in Theatre Survey in the last decades have received a total of 871 indexed citations . Papers published in Theatre Survey usually cover Music (160 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (166 papers) and Museology (59 papers) specifically the topics of Theatre and Performance Studies (146 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (145 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (58 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (56 papers), Irish and British Studies (38 papers), Philippine History and Culture (32 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (27 papers) and Diversity and Impact of Dance (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theatre Survey are Alexandra F. Johnston, Marvin Carlson, David Savran, Frank B. Wilderson, Edward A. Langhans, Bruce McConachie, Joseph Roach, Philip Auslander, Alain Badiou and Carol Symes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.