Endocrine Reviews

1.9k papers and 430.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Endocrine Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 430.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Endocrine Reviews usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (716 papers), Molecular Biology (601 papers) and Genetics (409 papers) specifically the topics of Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (254 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (181 papers) and Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Endocrine Reviews are Robert M. Sapolsky, Napoleone Ferrara, Andrea Dunaif, B L Wajchenberg, Stavros C. Manolagas, Allan Munck, Béatrice Desvergne, David R. Clemmons, Walter L. Miller and Vincent Giguère.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Endocrine Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Endocrine Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Endocrine Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Endocrine Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Endocrine Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Endocrine Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endocrine Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025