Annual Review of Physiology

2.6k papers and 297.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Annual Review of Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 297.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Physiology usually cover Molecular Biology (920 papers), Physiology (360 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (336 papers) specifically the topics of Ion channel regulation and function (255 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (140 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Physiology are Wade G. Regehr, Peter J. Murray, Judith Campisi, Gretchen E. Hofmann, Robert S. Zucker, Martin E. Feder, Michael P. Lesser, Timothy A. Springer, Christian de Duve and Robert Wattiaux.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025