Early Science and Medicine

576 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 576 papers published in Early Science and Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Early Science and Medicine usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (257 papers), History (158 papers) and Philosophy (106 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Philosophy and Science (162 papers), History of Science and Medicine (134 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early Science and Medicine are Peter R. Anstey, Gianna Pomata, William R. Newman, Lawrence M. Principe, Alan E. Shapiro, Steven J. Harris, Anita Guerrini, Christoph Lüthy, Sharon T. Strocchia and Michael Stolberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Early Science and Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early Science and Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early Science and Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Early Science and Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early Science and Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early Science and Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early Science and Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025