Peter R. Anstey

141 total papers · 1.9k total citations
47 papers, 351 citations indexed

About

Peter R. Anstey is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter R. Anstey has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 351 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 8 papers in Philosophy and 5 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Peter R. Anstey's work include Historical Philosophy and Science (31 papers), History of Science and Medicine (15 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (8 papers). Peter R. Anstey is often cited by papers focused on Historical Philosophy and Science (31 papers), History of Science and Medicine (15 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (8 papers). Peter R. Anstey collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Peter R. Anstey's co-authors include Michael Hunter, Stephen A. Harris, John Burrows, John A. Schuster, Michael Hunter, Lawrence M. Principe, Jocelyn Harris, Keith Campbell, Matthew Stuart and David Bronstein and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Mind and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

In The Last Decade

Peter R. Anstey

40 papers receiving 275 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Peter R. Anstey 236 122 73 48 33 47 351
James A. Weisheipl 114 0.5× 84 0.7× 32 0.4× 44 0.9× 17 0.5× 36 310
Thomas M. Lennon 251 1.1× 215 1.8× 57 0.8× 37 0.8× 31 0.9× 54 372
Douglas Jesseph 194 0.8× 106 0.9× 60 0.8× 28 0.6× 32 1.0× 30 331
Sachiko Kusukawa 126 0.5× 31 0.3× 81 1.1× 100 2.1× 25 0.8× 42 315
Brian P. Copenhaver 96 0.4× 82 0.7× 50 0.7× 79 1.6× 11 0.3× 35 313
William Eamon 150 0.6× 34 0.3× 83 1.1× 104 2.2× 17 0.5× 23 395
Charles G. Nauert 66 0.3× 100 0.8× 58 0.8× 146 3.0× 36 1.1× 34 390
William Charlton 75 0.3× 201 1.6× 58 0.8× 16 0.3× 11 0.3× 48 340
Paul Hoffman 199 0.8× 215 1.8× 23 0.3× 30 0.6× 14 0.4× 29 351
G. A. J. Rogers 154 0.7× 170 1.4× 22 0.3× 37 0.8× 62 1.9× 52 329

Countries citing papers authored by Peter R. Anstey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter R. Anstey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter R. Anstey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter R. Anstey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter R. Anstey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter R. Anstey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter R. Anstey. The network helps show where Peter R. Anstey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter R. Anstey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter R. Anstey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter R. Anstey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter R. Anstey. Peter R. Anstey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026