Countries where authors publish in Physical Oceanography
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical Oceanography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical Oceanography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical Oceanography more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Physical Oceanography
This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical Oceanography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical Oceanography.
About Physical Oceanography
The 742 papers published in Physical Oceanography in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Physical Oceanography usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (375 papers), Oceanography (605 papers), Geology (76 papers), Atmospheric Science (182 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (68 papers) specifically the topics of Marine and environmental studies (379 papers), Aquatic and Environmental Studies (346 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (262 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (137 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (105 papers), Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (86 papers), Climate variability and models (68 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical Oceanography are V. N. Belokopytov, С. Г. Демышев, Г. К. Коротаев, A. A. Kubryakov, E. N. Voskresenskaya, V. V. Knysh, S. V. Stanichny, В. А. Иванов, С. К. Коновалов and В. Н. Еремеев.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.