Early American literature

461 papers and 861 indexed citations

About

The 461 papers published in Early American literature in the last decades have received a total of 861 indexed citations. Papers published in Early American literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (158 papers), Political Science and International Relations (120 papers) and History (95 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (117 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (89 papers) and American History and Culture (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early American literature are Simon Gikandi, Frank Kelleter, Joanna Brooks, Paul Baepler, Lauren Klein, Vincent Carretta, Susan Scott Parrish, Elizabeth Maddock Dillon, Ralph Bauer and Sandra M. Gustafson.

In The Last Decade

Early American literature

163 papers receiving 281 citations

Fields of papers published in Early American literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early American literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early American literature.

Countries where authors publish in Early American literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early American literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early American literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early American literature more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026