Studies in American fiction

591 papers and 978 indexed citations

About

The 591 papers published in Studies in American fiction in the last decades have received a total of 978 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in American fiction usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (363 papers), History (162 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (85 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (183 papers), American Literature and Culture (81 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in American fiction are Susan M. Nuernberg, Sarah Robbins, Richard Pearce, Jessica Pressman, Peter Coviello, Robert S. Levine, Scott Donaldson, Thomas H. Pauly, Madhu Dubey and Linda W. Wagner.

In The Last Decade

Studies in American fiction

157 papers receiving 253 citations

Fields of papers published in Studies in American fiction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in American fiction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in American fiction.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in American fiction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in American fiction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in American fiction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in American fiction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026