Fred Moten

6.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
50 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Fred Moten is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Visual Arts and Performing Arts. According to data from OpenAlex, Fred Moten has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cultural Studies and 5 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Recurrent topics in Fred Moten's work include Theatre and Performance Studies (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers). Fred Moten is often cited by papers focused on Theatre and Performance Studies (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers). Fred Moten collaborates with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Fred Moten's co-authors include Stefano Harney, Candice M. Jenkins, Charles H Rowell, Gayle Salamon, Amy Villarejo, Miranda Joseph, Lisa Rofel, Roderick A. Ferguson, Kevin Floyd and Robert McRuer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, MLN and Social Text.

In The Last Decade

Fred Moten

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

In the Break: The Aesthetics of the Black Radical Tradition 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 2013 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fred Moten United States 14 825 433 277 251 204 50 1.7k
José Esteban Muñoz United States 14 1.1k 1.4× 602 1.4× 232 0.8× 223 0.9× 97 0.5× 44 2.4k
Ann Cvetkovich United States 13 1.0k 1.3× 424 1.0× 333 1.2× 106 0.4× 128 0.6× 33 2.2k
Hortense J. Spillers United States 9 1.0k 1.2× 510 1.2× 403 1.5× 145 0.6× 95 0.5× 41 1.9k
Aldon Lynn Nielsen United States 8 1.3k 1.5× 445 1.0× 436 1.6× 280 1.1× 131 0.6× 32 2.3k
Alexander G. Weheliye United States 8 715 0.9× 351 0.8× 160 0.6× 151 0.6× 91 0.4× 21 1.4k
Christina Sharpe Kenya 7 894 1.1× 341 0.8× 227 0.8× 81 0.3× 179 0.9× 14 1.6k
Shelley Fisher Fishkin United States 10 929 1.1× 296 0.7× 659 2.4× 109 0.4× 260 1.3× 45 1.9k
Toni Morrison United States 17 1.2k 1.5× 324 0.7× 751 2.7× 142 0.6× 409 2.0× 60 2.5k
Iain Chambers Italy 14 662 0.8× 157 0.4× 206 0.7× 212 0.8× 85 0.4× 70 1.3k
Janice Radway United States 13 846 1.0× 225 0.5× 617 2.2× 144 0.6× 118 0.6× 40 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Moten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Moten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Moten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Moten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Moten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Moten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Moten. The network helps show where Fred Moten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Moten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Moten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Moten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Moten. Fred Moten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moten, Fred & Stefano Harney. (2020). Czarność i rządzenie.
2.
Moten, Fred. (2020). Of Human Flesh. boundary 2. 47(2). 227–262. 1 indexed citations
3.
Moten, Fred. (2020). A Resistência do Objeto: O Grito de Tia Hester. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(1). 14–43. 2 indexed citations
4.
Moten, Fred. (2018). Stolen Life. 31 indexed citations
5.
Moten, Fred, et al.. (2018). Sudden Rise at a Given Tune. South Atlantic Quarterly. 117(3). 649–652.
6.
Moten, Fred. (2017). Black and Blur. 44 indexed citations
7.
Moten, Fred, et al.. (2015). In Conversation with Fred Moten. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 2(1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Harney, Stefano & Fred Moten. (2015). Michael Brown. boundary 2. 42(4). 81–87. 10 indexed citations
9.
Moten, Fred. (2014). the gramsci monument. Social Text. 32(1). 117–118. 2 indexed citations
10.
Harney, Stefano & Fred Moten. (2013). The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 468 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Moten, Fred, et al.. (2013). Theaster Gates: My Labor Is My Protest. 3 indexed citations
12.
Moten, Fred. (2013). test. 39(1). 95–97. 1 indexed citations
13.
Moten, Fred. (2013). The Subprime and the beautiful. African Identities. 11(2). 237–245. 25 indexed citations
14.
Moten, Fred. (2012). from Block Chapel. Callaloo. 35(3). 567–577.
15.
Moten, Fred. (2010). B Jenkins. 1 indexed citations
16.
Moten, Fred. (2007). Preface for a solo by Miles Davis. Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory. 17(2). 217–246. 14 indexed citations
17.
Moten, Fred. (2004). bessie smith. Callaloo. 27(4). 967–968.
18.
Moten, Fred. (2003). Magic of Objects. Callaloo. 26(1). 109–111. 1 indexed citations
19.
Moten, Fred. (2002). The New International of Decent Feelings. Social Text. 20(3). 189–199. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026