Annual Review of Economics

425 papers and 28.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 425 papers published in Annual Review of Economics in the last decades have received a total of 28.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (253 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (95 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (74 papers) specifically the topics of Economic theories and models (58 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (45 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Economics are Xavier Gabaix, James E. Anderson, Seema Jayachandran, Emir Kamenica, Abhijit Banerjee, Nathan Nunn, Rohini Pande, Raj Chetty, Mark R. Rosenzweig and Brigitte C. Madrian.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025