Child Care in Practice

775 papers and 5.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 775 papers published in Child Care in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Child Care in Practice usually cover Clinical Psychology (401 papers), Sociology and Political Science (236 papers) and Safety Research (215 papers) specifically the topics of Child Abuse and Trauma (167 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (164 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Child Care in Practice are Nicola Atwool, Babs Anderson, Robert J. Chaskin, Mike Stein, Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter, Mark A. Brennan, Alison Clark, Lisa Bunting, Brian J. Taylor and Ruth Sinclair.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Child Care in Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Child Care in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Child Care in Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Child Care in Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Child Care in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Child Care in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child Care in Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025