Journal of Family Social Work

550 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 550 papers published in Journal of Family Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Family Social Work usually cover Clinical Psychology (328 papers), Sociology and Political Science (214 papers) and General Health Professions (147 papers) specifically the topics of Child Welfare and Adoption (129 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (106 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Family Social Work are Carol M. Trivette, Carl J. Dunst, Loring P. Jones, Catherine E. Burnette, Nicholas Mazza, Rich Furman, Ann P. Turnbull, Jean Ann Summers, Katherine E. Marçal and Meekyung Han.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Family Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Family Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Family Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Family Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Family Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Family Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Family Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025