Journal of Biosocial Science

2.7k papers and 40.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Journal of Biosocial Science in the last decades have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Biosocial Science usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1000 papers), Gender Studies (710 papers) and General Health Professions (616 papers) specifically the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (750 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (589 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (303 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Biosocial Science are William H. James, Karri Silventoinen, Daniel Sellen, Rafat Hussain, J. Richard Udry, Isaac Addai, Jack Price, A.H. Bittles, C. G. N. Mascie‐Taylor and Marcus Richards.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Biosocial Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Biosocial Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Biosocial Science.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Biosocial Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Biosocial Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Biosocial Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Biosocial Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025