Anna Poletti

27 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Anna Poletti
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 47
  • Speech and Hearing 45
  • Literature and Literary Theory 68
  • Communication 32
  • Gender Studies 35
Replace James W. Fraser with:
James W. Fraser United States
Caroline Osborne United States
Susan Napier United States
R. G. Collingwood United States
Deborah A. Gordon United States
Sally Mitchell United States
Jim Cullen Canada
Michael Shields United States
Stephen M. Hart United Kingdom
Léo Germany
Anna Poletti relative to James W. Fraser United States James W. Fraser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
James W. Fraser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Poletti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Poletti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Poletti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Poletti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Poletti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Poletti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Poletti. The network helps show where Anna Poletti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Poletti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Poletti Line = papers co-authored together Anna Poletti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201076
2 201149
3 200639
4
The new ERA of journal ranking: The consequences of Australia's fraught encounter with 'quality'
201134
5 200828
6 201526
7 199925
8
The expression of proto-oncogene c-jun in human pancreatic cancer.
199921
9
Intimate Ephemera: Reading Young Lives in Australian Zine Culture
200819
10 200517
11 201616
12 201114
13 201614
14 200810
15 20149
16 20186
17 20125
18 20165
19
Introduction: Digital dialogues
20142
20 20172

About Anna Poletti

Anna Poletti is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Gender Studies and Speech and Hearing, having authored 34 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (8 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (4 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (47 citations), Speech and Hearing (45 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (68 citations), Communication (32 citations) and Gender Studies (35 citations). Anna Poletti has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kate Douglas, Gillian Whitlock, Rosanne Kennedy, Thomas Müller, P. Schlag, Matthew R. Bauer, Alessia Galasso, Michael J. Pankratz, Livia Garzia and Massimo Zollo. Their work appears in journals such as Biography, Canadian Review of American Studies, Life Writing, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and Oncology Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact