Leigh Gilmore

1.7k total citations
41 papers, 717 citations indexed

About

Leigh Gilmore is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Leigh Gilmore has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 717 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Leigh Gilmore's work include Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (6 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (3 papers). Leigh Gilmore is often cited by papers focused on Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (6 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (3 papers). Leigh Gilmore collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Leigh Gilmore's co-authors include Miriam Fuchs, Kathleen Ashley, Elizabeth Marshall, Sidonie Smith, Nancy K. Miller and Rosanne Kennedy and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Signs and American Literature.

In The Last Decade

Leigh Gilmore

34 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Leigh Gilmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Sociology and Political Science 306
  • Literature and Literary Theory 258
  • Gender Studies 131
  • Philosophy 103
  • History 95
Replace Nancy K. Miller with:
Nancy K. Miller United States
Paula Marantz Cohen United States
Elisabeth Bronfen Switzerland
Jonathan Dollimore United Kingdom
Sidonie Smith United States
Susan Rubín Suleiman United States
Anne Cheng France
Sue‐Ellen Case United States
Marina Warner United Kingdom
Keith Cohen
Nancy K. Miller United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Leigh Gilmore
Leigh Gilmore · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Leigh Gilmore
Leigh Gilmore · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Gilmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Gilmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Gilmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Gilmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leigh Gilmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Gilmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Gilmore. The network helps show where Leigh Gilmore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leigh Gilmore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leigh Gilmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leigh Gilmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leigh Gilmore. Leigh Gilmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 12
3 1
4 0
5 2
6 2
7 3
8 5
9 3
10 75
11 1
12 6
13 7
14 5
15 2
16
Girls in Crisis: Rescue and Transnational Feminist Autobiographical Resistance
19
17 23
18 263
19 47
20 15

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026