Applied Physics Reviews

1.0k papers and 54.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Applied Physics Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 54.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Physics Reviews usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (513 papers), Materials Chemistry (452 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (293 papers) specifically the topics of 2D Materials and Applications (99 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (94 papers) and Graphene research and applications (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Physics Reviews are R. T. Tung, F. Ren, Marko J. Tadjer, John Kitching, S. J. Pearton, Jihyun Kim, Jiancheng Yang, Michael A. Mastro, Chor Yen Yap and Z. H. Liu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Physics Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Physics Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Physics Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Physics Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Physics Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Physics Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Physics Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025