Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference DataUnited States
Annual Review of Physical ChemistryUnited States
Lecture notes in physicsGermany
Contemporary PhysicsUnited Kingdom
Nuclear Data SheetsUnited States
Annual Review of Fluid MechanicsUnited States
Comptes Rendus PhysiqueFrance
Annual Review of Astronomy and AstrophysicsUnited States
Physical Review XUnited States
Reports on Progress in PhysicsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · 1×
×2.1102.0kAMPO
×0.833.3kNHEP
×0.28.4kRADIA
×5.675.2kMC
×0.88.9kSCF
Citations per year, relative to Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
This network shows the impact of papers published in Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.