Cognitive Brain Research

1.1k papers and 86.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Cognitive Brain Research in the last decades have received a total of 86.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Brain Research usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (222 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (161 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (387 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (222 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Brain Research are Warren H. Meck, Vittorio Gallese, Leonardo Fogassi, Giacomo Rizzolatti, Luciano Fadiga, Mark D’Esposito, Martin Eimer, Jean Decety, Angela D. Friederici and John J. Foxe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Brain Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Brain Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Brain Research.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Brain Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Brain Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Brain Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Brain Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025